British feminist founder cat banyard: "retailers sell stunning men's editions" school kat bunyard visits the ads. There's a huge page for phone sex lines featuring women, legs bent or spread, stars covering their nipples, and genitals, next to captions that outline them as dirty whores, sexy cougars, and 60 grandmas. Banyard points to one ad for "all-age" porn production workers, and another large ad on the next page promising "asian dolls: choose your perfect oriental escort now!" She winces slightly. “I find it stunning that retail chains are selling these magazines. I mean, people have been placed in the range for years now, but i still find it overwhelming that movies expect users and professionals to be exposed to this, and above all that models think it's not scary. Profit from them.”
The 31-year-old banyard is the founder of uk feminista, a group that except for high school, not college, and provides grassroots feminist activists; since its inception in 2010, the medical document has been one of the most prominent campaigners in the russian federation. She wrote the book the illusion of equality, led a successful campaign to reform the law on lap dance clubs, allowing local authorities to more strictly license them as sex establishments, but not a primitive restaurant, and called for ads for cosmetic surgery to be outlawed. To a person whose work is driven by powerful, often angry opposition, she is remarkably humble and gentle.
By the end of last month, along with fellow feminist group object, uk. Feminista launched a campaign to lose the lads' mags. Their first step was to publish an open letter in a similar newspaper, now signed by 18 notaries, warning that publications and "media with pornographic covers" for men could be prosecuted. Lawyers pointed out that each store would typically also be a workplace, and that the presentation of these materials in work areas and/or requiring staff to handle them during this case could amount to discrimination based on lower horizontal surfaces and sexual harassment contrary to the act. On equality 2010."
Banyard compares magazines to the "women's calendars" so successful in the 1970s, and states: office walls. , Due to the fact that our firm is aware that the above provides a truly sexist and degrading environment for women. For men, the editions are the equivalent of women's calendars, which are in stock at the workplace of citizens in everyday places across the uk. Therefore, the campaign is calling on retailers to immediately remove all such publications from their shelves.
Controversy about the possible harm caused by sexist or pornographic publications has long been lively. Banyard firmly believes that for men, the publications provide “a favorable context for violence against members of the weaker sex and points to reports that criticize them, even the sexualization of youth survey (2010), commissioned by the department of the interior. It said that people "promote the idea of male attractiveness as based on energy - and aggression, depicting women as sexual objects and finishing with information in which strategies for manipulating women are encountered."
There was also a reverse source mill recently. For example, a 2011 middlesex https://vrhunter.net/tags/french/ university study found that participants had difficulty distinguishing comments from convicted rapists from comments taken from men's publications. (One sample patch from a magazine read: "a girl may like anal because doing it makes her feel incredibly naughty, long, long time, long time, long time, long time, and she wants to feel like a dirty fantasy slut.") A number of former editors of men's publications also expressed regret that our images were published. Martin dobney, who edited loaded for eight years, wrote in 2019 that "in hindsight, i think that online magazines like loaded did give young people "an interest in soft erotica, which leads to more serious and darker desires."
Earlier the other day, banyard, along with her colleagues, began the pursuit of the largest retailer in the area, tesco. Over the course of the week, she said, thousands of supporters "sent emails, tweets and messages to tesco's facebook and asked them to confirm that their commitment to corporate social responsibility is a far from exhaustive list of the merits of the conversation." Seems like tesco might be eavesdropping. 3 days after the start of the online campaign, the retailer tweeted that he would talk to publishers about packaging for baby magazine covers and even agreed to hold a meeting with campaign members. This is going to happen soon, and activists are also making it a point to attend tesco's june 28 agm, says banyard, "to make sure the resulting shareholder is aware of how harmful and harmful these magazines are."
Campaign definitely not without criticism. Their comments can range from casual and offensive - bunyard testifies that the porn bunny receives "too many emails telling me to go to the kitchen and that i really need an impressive cock" - to noticeably more thoughtful, important factors. . One of the gamers, who repeatedly came up, is that the calls for the removal of these magazines are an attack on freedom of speech. There have been several campaigns against men's publications in a quarter of a century, but the bulk of male buyers have called for either an age limit on sales or moving materials to the highest shelves.
Banyard says pests don't call for adoption slightest new laws, policies, or rules.” Instead, they are also asking retailers to "actively stop selling men's publications in the same way these diseases are now actively deciding to sell them." Another problem voiced by critics is that, and this is in relation to the success of this campaign, other magazines are attacked with similar tactics - for example, gay magazines with provocative covers. Finally, for men, publications are not the only articles that many people consider harmful. Fashion magazines are often suspected of developing unattainable ideals of beauty, and some of them weekly gossip magazines may objectify and dehumanize their covers by relentlessly focusing on their weight.
As for gay magazines, banyard says: the legal parameters regarding gender discrimination and sexual harassment are very specific and straightforward. This campaign." What governs women's magazines, "and the text messages they send out about beauty ideals, it's clear that images have developed a profoundly damaging effect," she continues, "so we'll raise the issue of men's magazines through the key role they play in fueling society." ". Environment and attitudes that prioritize violence against women.”
This campaign is one of a kind, focused on changing the representation of women in the british media. At times it repeats the "no more than page three" campaign, but where you only have to change one page of the british bestseller "the sun", the lose boys magazines campaign and success will more often than not ensure that these titles are wiped out. Be that as it may, the market for men's publications is declining sharply. In the second half of 2012, nuts sold mostly 80,186 copies a week, zoo 44,068 copies, a far cry from their heyday in the depths of the 2000s, while both had over 250,000 copies.
Banyard states that the page would keep you awake if the magazines closed. “I think beyond all measure, slowly, we have never worried about the girls and girls who bear the brunt of the consequences of how these magazines depict women. And what about their rights to environmental friendliness and safety and presence in the life of mankind openly? Tesco board should be concerned.